Good News! With Stanford's appeal overturned the Swiss bank can finally return the money in Stanford's account to the liquidators
Maldito y una persona
egoísta que sólo piensa en usted y buscan llenar sus bolsillos con el dinero
que están robando los liquidadores. Los liquidadores están demandando a las
víctimas inocentes que se retiraron dinero antes del colapso. No sabemos acerca
de la caída, de lo contrario habrían cerrado las cuentas. Los liquidadores
están haciendo un negocio detrás de los sufrimientos de las víctimas y usted ha dejado de ser víctimas a ser una persona miserable
corruptora que apoyan los liquidadores a cambio de beneficios y dinero.
The official site of Stanford International Victims Group - SIVG (http://sivg.org) and the SIVG official forum (http://sivg.org/forum/)
Datos interesantes:
Ladrón que roba a ladrón tiene cien años de perdón.
La mentira y el robo son vecinos de al lado.
Saturday, October 31, 2015
Tuesday, July 21, 2015
Receptor publica 12vo calendario de pagos conforme al plan de distribución provisional
Receptor
presenta 12vo calendario de pagos conforme al plan de distribución
provisional - 21 de Julio de 2015, el receptor presentó su 12vo
calendario de pagos de distribución con el Tribunal de distrito de
Estados Unidos para el distrito norte de Texas, División de Dallas. El
12vo programa será seguido por otros, cada uno de los cuales se
presentarán por el receptor sobre una base rodante como respuestas
adicionales a avisos de certificación son recibidas y procesadas. Para
ver una copia de la 12va distribución por favor haga clic aquí. click here.
¿Y qué pasó con el IRS?
Recordemos el afán de algunas víctimas para manipular y engañar al resto de las víctimas:
¿Y qué pasó con el IRS?
Recordemos el afán de algunas víctimas para manipular y engañar al resto de las víctimas:
Vergüenza!!!
¿Quién tiene su propia agenda? ¡Venga, sí! Los otros... Sólo los otros...
Lo que se construye con mentiras y malas intenciones se derrumbará tarde o temprano.
For a full and open debate on the Stanford Receivership visit the Stanford International Victims Group - SIVG official forum http://sivg.org/forum/
Monday, March 30, 2015
Gaytri Kachroo perdió el caso Zelaya et al. v. U.S
(Reuters) - Un tribunal federal de apelaciones dijo el lunes que los Estados Unidos no se hace responsable por las víctimas del fraude de Allen Stanford que acusaron a la SEC por ser incompetente al haber tomado mucho tiempo tiempo para descubrir el fraude por 7200 millones dólares.
Un panel de la Corte del 11vo Circuito de Apelaciones en Miami dijo que el gobierno tiene derecho a inmunidad soberana.
La nota completa:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/03/30/us-sec-stanford-idUSKBN0MQ22320150330
A federal appeals court said on Monday the United States is not liable to victims of Allen Stanford's fraud who claimed that the Securities and Exchange Commission was incompetent for having taken too long to uncover the swindler's $7.2 billion Ponzi scheme.
A panel of the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Miami said the government is entitled to sovereign immunity.
Stanford's victims accused the SEC of negligence for having waited until 2009 to uncover the Ponzi scheme, despite having had evidence of it as early as 1997.
But the court said the SEC had discretion to decide how to enforce securities laws, and could not be liable for certain misrepresentations. It said this justified shielding it from claims raised by the victims under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
"We reach no conclusions as to the SEC's conduct, or whether the latter's actions deserve plaintiffs' condemnation," Circuit Judge Julie Carnes wrote for a three-judge panel. "We do, however, conclude that the United States is shielded from liability for the SEC's alleged negligence."
Victims claimed that the SEC thought Stanford's business was a fraud after each of four examinations between 1997 and 2004, but failed to advise the Securities Investor Protection Corp, which compensates victims of failed brokerages.
The plaintiffs were led by Carlos Zelaya and George Glantz, who claimed to lose a combined $1.65 million, and sought class-action status. Monday's decision upheld rulings in 2013 by U.S. District Judge Robert Scola in Miami.
Gaytri Kachroo, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The U.S. Department of Justice, which represented the SEC in the appeal, did not immediately respond to similar requests.
In 2013, federal appeals courts in New York, Philadelphia and Pasadena, California, dismissed lawsuits accusing the SEC of incompetence in investigating Bernard Madoff.
Stanford, 65, is appealing his March 2012 conviction and 110-year prison term for what prosecutors called a scam centered on his sale of fraudulent high-yielding certificates of deposit through his Antigua-based Stanford International Bank.
The SEC's inspector general in 2010 criticized the regulator for being too slow to uncover Stanford's fraud.
The case is Zelaya et al. v. U.S., 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 13-14780.
Un panel de la Corte del 11vo Circuito de Apelaciones en Miami dijo que el gobierno tiene derecho a inmunidad soberana.
La nota completa:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/03/30/us-sec-stanford-idUSKBN0MQ22320150330
U.S. not liable for alleged SEC negligence in Stanford fraud: court
A federal appeals court said on Monday the United States is not liable to victims of Allen Stanford's fraud who claimed that the Securities and Exchange Commission was incompetent for having taken too long to uncover the swindler's $7.2 billion Ponzi scheme.
A panel of the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Miami said the government is entitled to sovereign immunity.
Stanford's victims accused the SEC of negligence for having waited until 2009 to uncover the Ponzi scheme, despite having had evidence of it as early as 1997.
But the court said the SEC had discretion to decide how to enforce securities laws, and could not be liable for certain misrepresentations. It said this justified shielding it from claims raised by the victims under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
"We reach no conclusions as to the SEC's conduct, or whether the latter's actions deserve plaintiffs' condemnation," Circuit Judge Julie Carnes wrote for a three-judge panel. "We do, however, conclude that the United States is shielded from liability for the SEC's alleged negligence."
Victims claimed that the SEC thought Stanford's business was a fraud after each of four examinations between 1997 and 2004, but failed to advise the Securities Investor Protection Corp, which compensates victims of failed brokerages.
The plaintiffs were led by Carlos Zelaya and George Glantz, who claimed to lose a combined $1.65 million, and sought class-action status. Monday's decision upheld rulings in 2013 by U.S. District Judge Robert Scola in Miami.
Gaytri Kachroo, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The U.S. Department of Justice, which represented the SEC in the appeal, did not immediately respond to similar requests.
In 2013, federal appeals courts in New York, Philadelphia and Pasadena, California, dismissed lawsuits accusing the SEC of incompetence in investigating Bernard Madoff.
Stanford, 65, is appealing his March 2012 conviction and 110-year prison term for what prosecutors called a scam centered on his sale of fraudulent high-yielding certificates of deposit through his Antigua-based Stanford International Bank.
The SEC's inspector general in 2010 criticized the regulator for being too slow to uncover Stanford's fraud.
The case is Zelaya et al. v. U.S., 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 13-14780.
Labels:
cheat victims,
Fraud,
Gaytri Kachroo,
KLS,
leech,
SEC,
SIPC,
thieves
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)